Closed freedomRen closed 3 years ago
Hello @freedomRen, indeed, there were some remnants of a parallel study (on autoencoders). I've updated the repo (0.31) and the example -> the artefacts sould not be present anymore. What do you get as the result btw?
I am very glad that you can fix the problem in time. I hope that future studies can get more results in prediction performance, because there is no comparison with GBDT, RF, LR, etc in this paper
Hey, yes, that's a good point. We are just working on a paper now, where RF and XGB are baselines. The preprint should be out in the next weeks -> I'll try to remind myself to link it here (spoiler alert: it works competitively if trained long enough with learning rates < 0.01), Thanks for the feedback!
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:42 AM freedomRen notifications@github.com wrote:
Closed #3 https://github.com/SkBlaz/san/issues/3.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SkBlaz/san/issues/3#event-4265028792, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACMSERFRLMRJX6XBNN32BZ3S4JYIXANCNFSM4WKINJBA .
I find there have different version of code in egg files. 1 . init.py 2 autoencoder_fr.py And file autoencoder_fr.py can not be used directly. I add num_heads in the obj SAN Here you can replace the intalled file init.py in your install path to get the same result figure