Open Daniel1464 opened 2 weeks ago
Is adding a second way to do the same thing necessary? Can we remove the other one?
Is adding a second way to do the same thing necessary? Can we remove the other one?
Possibly; I didn't want to introduce a breaking change.
The API is new for 2025, so we can break whatever we want before kickoff.
Currently, the way to construct AutoTrajectories is using the factory.trajectory method:
This PR provides a better-named alternative:
Note: c++ and docs updates are still tbd.