Closed maharjun closed 4 years ago
Hmm that's odd, do you have an example.?
Looking into the code I see
new_traj._run_information = self._run_information
,
so the range should be copied as well (i.e. that's just a reference and not a deep copy, but still).
inactive
From what I have observed, the default invocation of Trajectory.f_copy does not copy the exploration range of the parameters over to the new trajectory. This is again counterintuitive as a default call to a copy function should produce an identical object (irrespective of deepness of copy)