Closed micahjohnson150 closed 2 years ago
Looking for confirmation on kwargs specifically the observers and instrument names. Note in add_unm_gpr.py
I am attempting to upload two chunks at a time, splitting on the two frequencies. I am assuming this a separate instrument so in my loop I am modifying the instrument between Mala 800MHz GPR
and Mala 1600 MHz GPR
Yes, the two frequencies are separate instruments that were run simultaneously from the same sled. There will be some overlap of the data, but if I could process and see a reflection with the 1600 MHz antenna then I would not look at the 800 MHz as the 1600 has better precision for the twt data.
I looked very briefly, but the code looks good at first glance. I'll try to make some time to actually pull/plot the data to make sure it looks like it should.
Cool! You wont be able to find this on the main db yet. I added it to a local copy I have for testing. I still need to sort out some of the details around the 2 Mala instruments and then I will merge it and add it to the DB. I will keep you posted.
OK, thanks. It could be something as simple as use the 1600 MHz when available and the 800 MHz everywhere else with some sort of flag/indicator. That is how I would use the data anyways.
Ryan Webb Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil & Architectural Engineering & Construction Management University of Wyoming WebbHydrology.weebly.comhttp://webbhydrology.weebly.com
From: Micah Johnson @.> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 11:28 AM To: SnowEx/snowex_db @.> Cc: Ryan Webb @.>; Comment @.> Subject: Re: [SnowEx/snowex_db] Add more gpr datasets #2 (PR #14)
◆ This message was sent from a non-UWYO address. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments from external sources.
Cool! You wont be able to find this on the main db yet. I added it to a local copy I have for testing. I still need to sort out some of the details around the 2 Mala instruments and then I will merge it and add it to the DB. I will keep you posted.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/SnowEx/snowex_db/pull/14#issuecomment-1177970004, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AN2RJ4KR763O7MWZPTZM54LVS4HUZANCNFSM5256WQUQ. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
Ah I see. Well the uploader class I am using is pretty structured around a single instrument for a dataset. So I will just pivot the data on the frequency preemptively and upload them both as two datasets with the same DOI. The end use would allow for grabbing/filtering the db to the 800 when the 1600 is not available.
No problem. That will work great and allow more flexibility for the end user.
Thanks, Ryan
Ryan Webb Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil & Architectural Engineering & Construction Management University of Wyoming WebbHydrology.weebly.comhttp://webbhydrology.weebly.com
From: Micah Johnson @.> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 11:41 AM To: SnowEx/snowex_db @.> Cc: Ryan Webb @.>; Comment @.> Subject: Re: [SnowEx/snowex_db] Add more gpr datasets #2 (PR #14)
◆ This message was sent from a non-UWYO address. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments from external sources.
Ah I see. Well the uploader class I am using is pretty structured around a single instrument for a dataset. So I will just pivot the data on the frequency preemptively and upload them both as two datasets with the same DOI. The end use would allow for grabbing/filtering the db to the 800 when the 1600 is not available.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/SnowEx/snowex_db/pull/14#issuecomment-1177985964, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AN2RJ4PN27EP6NLUTPSFQJ3VS4JFVANCNFSM5256WQUQ. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
uploaded! Let me know if you have any issues!