Closed fmichonneau closed 6 years ago
Perhaps before "Why allow others to contribute to your project" I would add "How a to contribute" or rather "What is a contribution". I think it is good to clarify very early that a contribution is not necessarily a patch to your code which will suddenly fix all bugs, but that issues, suggestions and discussion are also valid and valuable forms of contribution.
Is there any reason to select this list of packages? It seems very R-heavy. Also, wouldn't it make sense to have the contributing guidelines for this lesson listed in there?
"You can acknowledge all contributors and reward contributions as co-authors if the contribution is substantial" -- co-authors of the software? Of future papers? Maybe it is appealing to researchers to know they can gain something by being contributors.
Does it make sense to provide some guideline on what size of project may require what level of governance? I think @tobyhodges mentioned there was some research done on this direction (up to 150 people don't need any formal governance).
This is a first milestone for the Contributions episode Authors @fmichonneau @Pfern @malvikasharan @orchid00 :) and thanks to comments from @c-martinez @JenHarrow Please review @mkuzak @fpsom
There are a few outstanding issues and typos in the PR. As soon as they are addressed, we can merge.
@mkuzak please review (or assign someone to do it).