Metadata episode - review after the hackathon utrecht August 1-3

[orchid00]

Leyla, Carlos, Fatma, Radka, @ljgarcia @c-martinez

I just merged the PRs on the metadata episode. https://github.com/SoftDev4Research/4OSS-lesson/pull/45 https://github.com/SoftDev4Research/4OSS-lesson/pull/38 https://github.com/SoftDev4Research/4OSS-lesson/pull/36 https://github.com/SoftDev4Research/4OSS-lesson/pull/32 https://github.com/SoftDev4Research/4OSS-lesson/pull/31 https://github.com/SoftDev4Research/4OSS-lesson/pull/30

Thanks for your contributions on the metadata episode, and your effort for addressing many comments. You can now continue to work on it.

How to continue?

• [ ] I recommend going through the issues https://github.com/SoftDev4Research/4OSS-lesson/issues and close those that have been already addressed.
• [x] When merging I noticed there is an exercise that has the same title, one of those might need to be removed or updated: "Exercise: Using a registry, e.g., bio.tools" It might have been my mistake, but there were about 25+ conflicts :S
• [x] One of the PR was changing participants for learners, I didn't know which one to pick. I particularly like participants better.
• [x] I would make a suggestion to look for a definition outside of wikipedia.
• [ ] Take a look at extra resources: https://www.ands.org.au/guides/metadata-working
• [ ] Continue the conversation on twitter, to find more examples!

This Issue can be closed or saved as record to add comments.

[fpsom]

Thanks @orchid00 ! That was awesome work - thank you very much for doing this. I will be going through the issues over the next few days and addressing them (either close or highlight as actionable).

I propose we keep this issue open for the follow-up actions as a reference point for the metadata episode.

[orchid00]

sounds good!

[fpsom]

Just added PR #52 that addresses some of the points.