Document best practices on component architecture.

[github-actions[bot]]

Sigrid maintainability feedback

✅ You wrote maintainable code and achieved your Sigrid objective of 3.0 stars

Sigrid compared your code against the baseline of 2024-10-17.

👍 What went well?

You fixed or improved 0 refactoring candidates.

👎 What could be better?

Unfortunately, 3 refactoring candidates were introduced or got worse.

Risk	System property	Location
🟡	Unit Size (Introduced)	src/azure_pull_request_report.py AzurePullRequestReport.generate(analysisId,feedback,options)
🟡	Unit Interfacing (Introduced)	src/azure_pull_request_report.py AzurePullRequestReport.callAzure(method,body,threadId)
🟡	Unit Interfacing (Worsened)	src/azure_pull_request_report.py AzurePullRequestReport.generate(analysisId,feedback,options)

📚 Remaining technical debt

0 refactoring candidates didn't get better or worse, but are still present in the code you touched.

Sigrid ratings

System property	System on 2024-10-17	Before changes	New/changed code
Volume	5.5	N/A	N/A
Duplication	5.5	5.5	5.5
Unit Size	4.3	5.5	4.3
Unit Complexity	3.8	5.5	5.5
Unit Interfacing	2.1	1.5	1.3
Module Coupling	3.1	N/A	N/A
Component Independence	N/A	N/A	N/A
Component Entanglement	N/A	N/A	N/A
Maintainability	4.0	5.0	4.6

---

View this system in Sigrid

---

Did you find this feedback helpful?

We would like to know your thoughts to make Sigrid better. Your username will remain confidential throughout the process.

• ✅ Yes, these findings are useful
• 🔸 The findings are false positives
• 🔹 These findings are not so important to me