Solaestas / Everglow

GNU General Public License v3.0
29 stars 4 forks source link

Branch Management Scheme 分支管理方案 #20

Open lace-wing opened 2 years ago

lace-wing commented 2 years ago

Catalogue

Everglow's Branch Management Scheme

Structure

Naming rules

Content management

Branch creation and merging

Notice

流光无际分支管理方案

分支构成

命名规则

内容管理

分支开设与合并

注意事项

Setnour6 commented 2 years ago

Can we still use our names for the new branches, such as "setnour6/Yggdrasil/MothEye-FBB-Rework", or does it strictly have to be module names, such as "Yggdrasil/MothEye-FBB-Rework"?

Solaestas commented 2 years ago

i think it's better to use Yggdrasil/setnour6, as we sometimes don't want to mix up modules

(real name is hidden) @.***

 

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "dfgasdfg/Everglow" @.>; 发送时间: 2022年10月21日(星期五) 晚上10:22 @.>; @.***>; 主题: Re: [dfgasdfg/Everglow] Branch Management Scheme 分支管理方案 (Issue #20)

Can we still use our names for the new branches, such as "setnour6/Yggdrasil/MothEye-FBB-Rework", or does it strictly have to be module names, such as "Yggdrasil/MothEye-FBB-Rework"?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

Setnour6 commented 2 years ago

i think it's better to use Yggdrasil/setnour6, as we sometimes don't want to mix up modules

Sure, though I am used to seeing names, and then modules, and then features, such as "omnielement/firefly/fireworm" for example, to see who is assigned to or mainly working on the branch.