Closed wholmgren closed 3 years ago
@dplarson can you review this? I think this cleans up the terminology and symbols in a way that is consistent with Wilks 2019 but with i and k reversed (pdf below for reference).
Chapter-9---Forecast-Verifica_2019_Statistical-Methods-in-the-Atmospheric-Sc.pdf
@wholmgren I support these changes, though I did not generate the HTML to check the LaTeX rendering. The only thing I'm still a little iffy on is the use of o_i
as the event outcome. Or to be clearer, I don't think there is a problem with using o_i
, but rather I have wondered whether a more explicit indicator-like notation (e.g. 1_{x <= x_0}
) would be better. However, the verbosity of such a notation may not actually provide a clearer understanding. Which is a long winded way to say "I'm good with the changes and feel free to ignore my other comments unless you strongly agree."
EDIT: Actually, please ignore my comments on alternatives to o_i
given that Wilks 2019 uses o_i
and following a good reference like Wilks 2019 trumps using an alternative that may or may not be clearer.
All good points. Thanks for the review @dplarson!
Fixes inconsistencies regarding the index used for the time. Now time index is i throughout document. Unfortunately, Wilks 2019 uses the opposite convention in the Brier score section, which I think this was originally modeled on.