The wider 'state/territory' wording needed to be split up so the <th> wasn't too wide, messing up the styling of the row. (I ran into this while reviewing PR #1074.) I checked for other cases of this and this seems to be the only header row that uses this kind of styling that has 'state/territory'.
The wider 'state/territory' wording needed to be split up so the
<th>
wasn't too wide, messing up the styling of the row. (I ran into this while reviewing PR #1074.) I checked for other cases of this and this seems to be the only header row that uses this kind of styling that has 'state/territory'.Before:
After:
Issue #62 Include territories in list of states?