Closed AndreyK641 closed 3 years ago
Hello! In the functions improve_ff_block is it correct to replace code
for ix in range(1): if ix == 0: x1 = input_tensor1 x1 = concatenate([x1, input_tensor1], axis=3) x1 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(x1)
by
x1 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(input_tensor1) x1 = concatenate([x1, x1], axis=3)
and
for ix in range(3): if ix == 0: x2 = input_tensor2 x2 = concatenate([x2, input_tensor2], axis=3) x2 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(4, 4))(x2)
by
x2 = x = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(4, 4))(input_tensor2) for ix in range(3): x2 = concatenate([x2, x], axis=3)
?
I think it is possible to apply this approach for x3 and x4 calculation.
Hello! I have a question that why the evaluation index of same method in the cloudnet and cloudnet++ are different
Hello! In the functions improve_ff_block is it correct to replace code
for ix in range(1): if ix == 0: x1 = input_tensor1 x1 = concatenate([x1, input_tensor1], axis=3) x1 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(x1)
by
x1 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(input_tensor1) x1 = concatenate([x1, x1], axis=3)
and
for ix in range(3): if ix == 0: x2 = input_tensor2 x2 = concatenate([x2, input_tensor2], axis=3) x2 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(4, 4))(x2)
by
x2 = x = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(4, 4))(input_tensor2) for ix in range(3): x2 = concatenate([x2, x], axis=3)
?
I think it is possible to apply this approach for x3 and x4 calculation.
Yes, they are equivalent.
Hello! In the functions improve_ff_block is it correct to replace code
by
and
by
?
I think it is possible to apply this approach for x3 and x4 calculation.