Open kimdn opened 2 years ago
Hi Kim,
You do not need to specify a basis set for semiempirical calculations using the SEMIEMP code. Please see the "manual.pdf" file for a sample input. I have an implementation of PM3 and AM1 in this code but it is not well-tested and these methods are not mentioned in the manual. I would not recommend using any method that is not mentioned in the manual without going through the code carefully. I developed this code to perform spectroscopic calculations on large systems using real-time INDO/S method. Please see this two papers where we have reported the code and relevant applications-
Soumen Ghosh, Jason C. Asher, Laura Gagliardi, Christopher J. Cramer, Niranjan Govind. A Semiempirical Effective Hamiltonian Based Approach for Analyzing Excited State Wave Functions and Computing Excited State Absorption Spectra Using Real-Time Dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 104103 .
Soumen Ghosh, Amity Andersen, Laura Gagliardi, Christopher J. Cramer and Niranjan Govind. Modeling Optical Spectra of Large Organic Systems using Real-Time Propagation of Semiempirical Effective Hamiltonians. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 4410−4420.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Best,
Soumen Ghosh
Can I know which basis set is the most accurate one in nwchem_semiemp?
It appears nwchem_semiemp uses CNDO, INDO/1, MNDO, AM1, and PM3. Since I can’t find “PM5” in semiemp code, can I assume that the most accurate one is PM3?
However, when I specified
output.out shows
APPROXIMATE HAMILTONIAN=PM5
So PM5 is the most accurate one?