Closed dbrgn closed 3 years ago
Can we order afterwards by type (added, changed, removed) and then alphabetically?
@gidsi I'd prefer not to, because sometimes two entries are related. For example:
- [changed] The `jabber` key was renamed to `xmpp`[#8]
- [added] The `keymasters` array items can also contain a `xmpp` field ([#8])
Those two were previously separate from each other, which confused me a lot when going through the items one by one (because an xmpp
field in keymasters
is only valid if that's a valid contact
entry, but that part of the changelog was listed farther down) :slightly_smiling_face:
I'd optimize for logical grouping.
I found the older format quite confusing when trying to systematically implement all changes. The items were not in a logical order, but seemingly random.
Instead, I grouped them by top level key.