SpanishSurfer / becti_zerty_OFPS.Altis

OFPS flavoring of Benny/Zerty's work.
http://ofps.net/viewforum.php?f=6
Other
4 stars 6 forks source link

Too many carriers #56

Closed SpanishSurfer closed 8 years ago

SpanishSurfer commented 8 years ago

Can we reduce the carriers to just 1? Really far to the north would be best spot. We have too many now.

Liveandletdie commented 8 years ago

any reason y you dont want more? from our tests they do not affect server FPS and are all set to enablesimulation false like the other structures....i think we are the bare min need the west and north ones

SpanishSurfer commented 8 years ago

It's just not realistic to have so many. On Mar 9, 2016 12:52 AM, "Liveandletdie" notifications@github.com wrote:

any reason y you dont want more? from our tests they do not affect server FPS and are all set to enablesimulation false like the other structures....i think we are the bare min need the west and north ones

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpanishSurfer/becti_zerty_OFPS.Altis/issues/56#issuecomment-194126040 .

Liveandletdie commented 8 years ago

beyond just adding some new cool stuff to the map, the idea was to add safe landing areas to areas of the map which are lacking in airstrips, hence the west and north carriers. With the introduction of all the new planes we need some safer land/rearm/repair locations. My vote is to keep west/north and remove east one

SpanishSurfer commented 8 years ago

How about one WAY north and one WAY south. Right now a player with a Titan can easily lock and destroy a plane that lands on them. They're visible from the shore. On Mar 9, 2016 1:35 PM, "Liveandletdie" notifications@github.com wrote:

beyond just adding some new cool stuff to the map, the idea was to add safe landing areas to areas of the map which are lacking in airstrips, hence the west and north carriers. With the introduction of all the new planes we need some safer land/rearm/repair locations. My vote is to keep west/north and remove east one

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpanishSurfer/becti_zerty_OFPS.Altis/issues/56#issuecomment-194441166 .

Liveandletdie commented 8 years ago

i agree with moving further out....south already has aac and selekano strips. West has nothing, it is the most lacking airspace on the map

SpanishSurfer commented 8 years ago

No carrier would ever get that close to hostile shore, hence why use north and south On Mar 9, 2016 1:48 PM, "Liveandletdie" notifications@github.com wrote:

i agree with moving further out....south already has aac and selekano strips. West has nothing, it is the most lacking airspace on the map

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpanishSurfer/becti_zerty_OFPS.Altis/issues/56#issuecomment-194447373 .

Liveandletdie commented 8 years ago

south of vikos? Why not one far west?

SpanishSurfer commented 8 years ago

East/West part of map don't go out very far. On Mar 9, 2016 2:21 PM, "Liveandletdie" notifications@github.com wrote:

south of vikos? Why not one far west?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpanishSurfer/becti_zerty_OFPS.Altis/issues/56#issuecomment-194462741 .