Inconsistent chaining command behaviour

[SpdPnd98]

If I did find test &&, the application is able to detect that no commands are chained

But if I have multiple chaining commands find test && && && && &&, it doesn't exhibit the same behaviour.

[nus-pe-bot]

Team's Response

In case 1 && is taken as chaining find test and ` which result infind testbeing evaluated and there are no ambiguities. Case 2 the chain command will chainfind testand&& && && &&` the latter being an unknown command format hence error message is raised.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

• [x] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: I expect both the commands above to consistently exhibit either one of these behaviours:

1. && && && && should not be an unknown format, but viewed as multiple chain commands. What I expect is && && && && to be chained with (spaces) as well. So it should be

   1. find test chain (space)
   2. ` (space) chain `(space)
   3. ` (space) chain `(space)
   4. ` (space) chain `(space)
   5. ` (space) chain `(space)

2. find 3 && should show unknown format, as not having left command should be invalid. This is also stated in your UG, where there has to be two commands (both left and right!)

Since both is shown, this hints to me that there is a problem with the parser format and/or potential incorrect use of .trim().

---