Closed kamranayub closed 2 years ago
In the meantime it got a little bit more complicated with the Backgrounds in Rules. Because Cucumber and we never removed it from the Gherkin specification and some Implementations now implemented it, we decided to change our decission. Rules will have backgrounds. This was made 2-3 months ago. Implementing them in SpecFlow will take some time, because it isn't the easiest change.
@alimogithub What do we do with this in the documentation? Should we add some notes, that it is in the standard, but not yet supported?
@SabotageAndi It makes sense to comment it out of docs for now until it's supported again. @kamranayub thanks for raising this. I have removed it from docs for the time being.
Thanks all and thanks for making SpecFlow so awesome 😎
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Product:
What is missing:
On this page it explains I can use the
Background
under aRule
:https://docs.specflow.org/projects/specflow/en/latest/Gherkin/Gherkin-Reference.html#background
However, it wasn't working and I discovered #2117 and it was closed with the explanation:
https://github.com/SpecFlowOSS/SpecFlow/issues/2117#issuecomment-690925970
It would be nice to remove the language for it if I can't end up using it.
FWIW I think it seemed to make it easier to organize my scenarios (per-rule variations on background steps) but I understand the reasoning. I'll just re-organize into separate files I think 🤔