infratribe defies to be edited

[typophyllum]

I'm trying to synonymize infratribe Scaphurae (genus group in old OSF) with tribe Scaphurini (stat. nov. - published June 11th), but Edit taxon name is sort of inert. Not possible to establish objective synonym relationship nor add missing type genus Scaphura.

Unintelligible error:

[typophyllum]

The first isn't true and it doesn't let the second be resolved:

[typophyllum]

What does this mean? Appears when I try to change the status of Scaphurae to invalid.

[typophyllum]

This seems to be the correct relationship for Scaphurae Westwood, 1838 with Scaphurini:

... but the error keeps appearing ...

Is Scaphurae the subject_taxon_name? Currently valid. Scaphurini too.

Apparently I need to make Scaphurae invalid first (just tested in Sandcastle), but none of the categories seems to match, and the problem of the previous comment occurs, "Name must end in -ad".

[proceps]

please use "family group name form" relationship. TW uses synonymy in strinct ICZN sense.

[typophyllum]

How do I then add citations for the original form Scaphurae (used in altogether four sources)? Only for Subsequent name forms can be added citations.

[proceps]

[proceps]

Citation on protonym is always added to the original form. Citation on subsequent forms will be added to those.

[typophyllum]

Thank you, I think I understood how it works. Now it looks like this:

[typophyllum]

When I now change the infratribes ending in -ae to tribes ending in -ini, add the original form with -ae below, and the subsequent form with -ini, the display looks strange:

Aegimiini as synonym of itself. Should I have added Aegimiini as new name and then established the relationship of Aegimiae to Aegimiini separately? But in the Scaphurini example above which I reconstructed from scratch occurs the same.

[proceps]

Look at the timeline, everything looks correct: The classification tree shows you that there are two protonyms.

[typophyllum]

Thank you.

The paper published today proposes a few infratribes ending in -ita (to accommodate groups below subtribes). TW doesn't like this.

[proceps]

ICZN does not regulate the endings of infratribes. I do not remember where the initial idea of -ad came from. I think, I will just remove the restriction.