Open debpaul opened 1 month ago
Do we actually have a place for that @mjy? The importer is not importing that (although it can as data attribute), however the exporter has no collectionCode
. The closest thing I now TW supports is looking up identifiers of type Identifier::Local::CatalogNumber
(hopefully only one of them) and assume that the namespace's short name is the collectionCode (not always the case).
@LocoDelAssembly I guess we could put them in as data attributes? dwc:basisOfRecord (or similar) will be needed as we publish different types of data (field/human observation data, paleo, biological specimens, etc).
You may import as data attributes by following https://docs.taxonworks.org/guide/import.html#mappings-to-dwc-predicates (only <term>
part needs to be in column name). This is a project-wide setting, not something you set up on every import.
Steps to reproduce the bug
Screenshot
Expected behavior
Upon upload of a dataset that includes the collectionCode column, that this term and the values provided would be in the Darwin Core output that one sees in Browse CO.
Work done here by Davide Dal Pos to test the DwC Importer Where: Sandbox, https://sandbox.taxonworks.org, project = UCF Collection - The Bug Closet Which DwC Importer dataset? either Final2 and Final_parsing
Additional Screenshots
No response
Environment
Sandbox
Sandbox Used
sandbox
Version
fbfe6cb54
Browser Used
No response