SpeciesFileGroup / taxonworks

Workbench for biodiversity informatics.
http://taxonworks.org
Other
84 stars 25 forks source link

Task - edit taxon name. - Preference for section order #664

Open proceps opened 5 years ago

proceps commented 5 years ago

Put Relationship and Status at the very end, they are supposed to be more rarely used than the rest

jlpereira commented 5 years ago

Making that change the new order will be:

This is the correct order you want? or you want to move another section?

proceps commented 5 years ago

Yes, I think this is better.

mjy commented 5 years ago

Mmm not sure I agree. Gender, and etymology will be very rare for most people, certainly belong at bottom. Status is more important than type as well in terms of frequency. Frankly- we should calculate this from your data @proceps and see what is most used. By far you use relationships more than anything!

Basic information Author Type Status Relationships Original combination and classification Gender and form Etymology On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:46 PM Dmitry Dmitriev notifications@github.com wrote:

Yes, I think this is better.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

proceps commented 5 years ago

I have all historical data in the database. So those section supposed to be touched less often. For newly published names, you definitely do not need those...

jlpereira commented 5 years ago

@mjy what you think to implement here something like we are doing in digitize? save the order as a preference?

mjy commented 5 years ago

New names are touched 1 once. Everything else is history though! Even in your case, where things are are rare, it will be more common for relationships than new names, no? On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:16 PM Dmitry Dmitriev notifications@github.com wrote:

I have all historical data in the database. So those section supposed to be touched less often. For newly published names, you definitely do not need those...

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

mjy commented 5 years ago

Yes. Preference is perfect idea. When we merge in digitize.

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:17 PM José Luis Pereira notifications@github.com wrote:

@mjy https://github.com/mjy what you think to implement here something like we are doing in digitize? save the order as a preference?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks/issues/664#issuecomment-440132477, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABYSEP6Oh26BZCjap2EDTKMi-D0XgwNks5uw4JogaJpZM4YqTf9 .

proceps commented 5 years ago

All forms need to be condensed. Too much white space and scrolling. Shorter form may also resolve the issue

jlpereira commented 5 years ago

That is something that could be store in the preferences too

mjy commented 5 years ago

@proceps Please stop adding multiple comments per issue (e.g. here whitespace comment). Keep spamming new ones, one thing todo per issue. Thanks!

mjy commented 5 years ago

Will make it a preference. Blocker is #337