SpeciesFileGroup / taxonworks_doc

TaxonWorks (https://taxonworks.org) documentation.
https://docs.taxonworks.org
13 stars 13 forks source link

As a curator I want to know the SOP for generating a citation for my data in a TaxonWorks project. #40

Closed mjy closed 1 year ago

mjy commented 3 years ago

Related: https://github.com/SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks/issues/1666

tmcelrath commented 3 years ago

Initial Question from TCM - what are your thoughts on how we can best cite the Cucujoidea World Catalog right now?We have a paper going to print soon that cites data from the catalog, but we don't have a DOI or URL to cite. We can just use the project URL: https://sfg.taxonworks.org/projects/14. But that's password protected. Which is fine, but not super repeatable or trackable.

mjy commented 3 years ago
JohnHeraty commented 3 years ago

Similar Questions for the Universal Chalcidoidea Database.

Authorship: is this still Noyes as author, or do we start citing the chalcid consortium, or our core group (Noyes, Yoder, Woolley, Burks, me; we were all at the heart of getting this up and running), or what about recognizing other curators (Dal Molin, Jansta, Dale-Skey, etc) = Chalcidoidea Consortium of Curators)

Title: still Universal Chalcidodea Database? or TaxonWorks Chalcidoidea Database?

Website link: website link (alas closed to the public)?? Can we get a static version for public viewing without non 'public' pdfs?

proceps commented 3 years ago

I think it is good to have TaxonWorks... or TaxonWorks:... as a prefix for all project names.

mjy commented 3 years ago

There is not going to be an easy answer here, and almost certainly there will be multiple answers.

Things to remember:

I think perhaps focus on the types of citations we want to make, I suspect this will help guide things:

... others?

mjy commented 3 years ago

Revised types of citations to consider:

debpaul commented 3 years ago

Citing Specify Software (from a recent paper in BDJ).

in the text image Note the first URL points to this text:

Specify Collections Consortium (2019) Specify 6. 6.7.04. University of Kansas Center for Research. Release date: 2019-10-15. URL: https://www.sustain.specifysoftware.org/

the second URL in the above screenshot points to:

Specify Collections Consortium (2017) Biological collections using Specify. http://www.sustain.specifysoftware.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Specify-Collections-9-18-17.pdf. Accessed on: 2019-6-04.

in the references image

@mjy which of your examples outlined above do these fit as exemplar? While https://www.sustain.specifysoftware.org takes you to the project pages, you then do have to go and find the spot to download their various versions of code available.

In the article, (from a very quick read), I don't see anywhere that the authors specifically stated which version of specify they are using ...

debpaul commented 3 years ago

Some BibTeX examples

debpaul commented 3 years ago

Note Voyant tools has an interesting Cite Me tool we can look at. image

mjy commented 3 years ago

Screen Shot 2021-05-25 at 4 50 02 PM

Screen Shot 2021-05-25 at 4 50 14 PM

Screen Shot 2021-05-25 at 4 50 20 PM

JohnHeraty commented 3 years ago

The formatted version in TW is pretty odd (Group, S.F.) and the same in endnotes.

The best I can do in endnotes is: Species_File_Group and Collaborators. (2021) Taxonworks, software by the Taxonworks Collaborative Community. [Available via https://taxonworks.org https://taxonworks.org/].

so what about the TW Universal Chalcidoidea Database?

On May 25, 2021, at 2:52 PM, Matt @.***> wrote:

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22600/119573156-81204400-bd79-11eb-8397-57dc6e83eade.png https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22600/119573213-91382380-bd79-11eb-9d52-670f68d630a6.png

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpeciesFileGroup/taxonworks_doc/issues/40#issuecomment-848290305, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHF2MJB3UBEJ7YEUD2GBRF3TPQL3PANCNFSM43IHHLVA.

debpaul commented 3 years ago

Interesting note (although it doesn't seem to work), I found a reference that suggests if you put the value for the element (in bibtex) in quotation marks, that BibTeX would display an organization name correctly.

See How can I make an organization name display correctly?

BibTeX reads text in the author field as an author's name or names unless told otherwise. For example, say a reference exported from RefWorks contains the line: author={Institute of Electrical Engineers}, BibTeX will read this field as a person's name, where the first name is "Institute" and the last name is "of Electrical Engineers," and would format accordingly. Use a text editor and to add quotes around the field so that the line reads: author="{Institute of Electrical Engineers}", Now BibTeX will read this all as one piece rather than as a person's name, and will format correctly.

debpaul commented 3 years ago

See https://www.force11.org/software-citation-principles

debpaul commented 3 years ago

Trying to use double {{author string}} or {\{author string}}as suggested to preserve literal text string for author. So far, no joy. See https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/10808/using-a-corporate-author-in-the-author-field-of-a-bibliographic-entry-spell for what some say works.

tmcelrath commented 2 years ago

Planning on something like this for an upcoming paper that cites our Cucujoidea project: "McElrath TC, Thomas MC, & Yoshida T. 2021. Family Laemophloeidae, Cucujoidea World Catalog, TaxonWorks. Retrieved Oct 26, 2021 from https://sfg.taxonworks.org/."