Closed dalcde closed 2 years ago
A simple solution to this is to say \SseqErrorToWarning{range-overflow}
. Not the most discoverable I guess.
I have that but it pollutes the log and also I can't rely on it to tell me what the right scale to use is
On 8 July 2021 05:06:11 GMT+08:00, Hood Chatham @.***> wrote:
A simple solution to this is to say
\SseqErrorToWarning{range-overflow}
. Not the most discoverable I guess.-- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/SpectralSequences/latex/issues/11#issuecomment-875932693
Do you want a command that says "for the rest of this scope we are landscape"? Maybe that would be the best thing, and I guess we can also use an environment hook to automatically issue it in the sideways environment.
Of course it would be better if it were automatic, but something manual would be very helpful in the time being.
Okay I will define three commands: \SseqRangeCheckStandard
, \SseqRangeCheckSideways
, and \SseqRangeCheckOff
. Then I can do \AtBeginEnvironment{sideways}{\SseqRangeCheckSideways}
.
Closed by #14.
This currently doesn't work when the sseq is defined via sseqdata, e.g.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage{spectralsequences}
\begin{document}
\begin{sseqdata}[name = foo]
\class(0,0)
\class(17,9)
\end{sseqdata}
\begin{sideways}
\printpage[name = foo]
\end{sideways}
\end{document}
Specfying range check sideways
in either the sseqdata
and printpage
does not work.
Oh wait, your test still doesn't work.
Okay, now I think the logic here makes sense.
If we put a spectral sequence in a
sideways
environment from therotating
package, it complains that the x range is too large, even thought it is actually fine.