Closed drewheard closed 2 years ago
One way is to use the y tick handler
key. The following seems to look pretty good. It doesn't seem to get the spacing of the labels correct by default so I put an extra \quad
of spacing to the right.
\begin{sseqpage}[
y tick handler = {
\ifnum#1 = 0\relax
0%
\else
\ifnum#1>1\relax#1\fi n - #1%
% labels too close to axis by default
% so insert a bit of extra space
\quad
\fi
}
]
\class(0,0)
\class(4,4)
\end{sseqpage}
As another approach, the manual gives the following example:
\begin{sseqpage}[ no x ticks, x range = {0}{3} ]
\begin{scope}[ background ]
\node at (0,\ymin - 1) {0};
\node at (1,\ymin - 1) {n};
\foreach \n in {2,..., \xmax}{
\node at (\n,\ymin - 1) {\n n};
}
\end{scope}
\class(0,0)
\class(3,2)
\end{sseqpage}
which could be adapted to your use case. This would probably be the way to go if the labels are particularly complicated.
Thanks Hood! FYI, the manual at https://ctan.uib.no/graphics/pgf/contrib/spectralsequences/manual/spectralsequencesmanual.pdf is shorter than it should be, I believe (in particular, the example you gave doesn't appear)
OK, the code
\begin{sseqpage}[no x ticks,no y ticks, classes = {draw = none},homological Serre grading]
\begin{scope}[ background ]
\node at (0,-1) {0};
\node at (3,-1) {n};
\node at (-1,0) {0};
\node at (-1,2) {n-1\quad};
\node at (-1,4) {2n-2 \quad};
\node at (-1,6) {3n-3\quad};
\end{scope}
\class["\mathbb{Z}"](0,0)
\class["\mathbb{Z}"](3,0)
\class["H_{n-1}(\Omega S^n)"](0,2)
\class["H_{n-1}(\Omega S^n)"](3,2)
\class["H_{2n-2)}(\Omega S^n)"](0,4)
\class["H_{2n-2)}(\Omega S^n)"](3,4)
\class["H_{3n-3)}(\Omega S^n)"](0,6)
\class["H_{3n-3)}(\Omega S^n)"](3,6)
\d3(3,0)
\d3(3,2)
\d3(3,4)
\end{sseqpage}
works almost perfectly, except for the clipping. Any easy way to fix that?
I think y axis gap=1.5cm, x axis extend end=1cm
looks about right. You may also want right clip padding
. The following diagram which should appear at the end of the manual explains the various parameters to adjust the chart display:
Looks fantastic. Thanks again (and for the great package!)
the manual is shorter than it should be
Thanks for pointing that out. I guess I should release a new version with the manual fixed...
Not sure if it is an issue as such, but is there a way to "fake" the label axis, to have something like Example 5.5 of https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/ATch5.pdf?