Closed TimoGlastra closed 9 months ago
@nklomp would you be able to take a quick look at this PR and release a new version? It's a dependency for the upstream work in PEX, so then all remaining work is to be done in ssi-types + PEX
I would for sure add the metadata values as optional. To me it seems the HAIP profile does suggest them to be present, if you look at the texts talking about it. I think they simply haven't updated the example.
If we make them optional then we can have implementer choose where they want to put it
@nklomp the fields are only described in the verifier metadata (see https://vcstuff.github.io/oid4vc-haip-sd-jwt-vc/draft-oid4vc-haip-sd-jwt-vc.html#name-verifier-metadata).
However, the section on presentation definition specifically mentions the object is empty:
The presentation of a SD-JWT VC is requested by adding an object named vc+sd-jwt to the format object of an input_descriptor. The object is empty.
So maybe that needs to be changed in HAIP, but they're not defined for the PEX formats.
I'll add them as optional for now, as otherwise you can't really convey this metadata in PEX without using OpenID4VC
This is not a concern of HAIP though, so I'm not sure if they're open to change this
Updated the PR to include the properties as optional
This adds support for the
vc+sd-jwt
format as described in HAIP. It's a bit weird, as the spec describes that the object must be empty: https://vcstuff.github.io/oid4vc-haip-sd-jwt-vc/draft-oid4vc-haip-sd-jwt-vc.html#name-presentation-definitionThe actual alg values supported etc.. are defined in the client metadata, and not in the PD. This works ok when using this format with HAIP, but if you use e.g. DIDComm with PEX it would be nice to also have these values here. I think once the formats will be registered in the DIF registry, it may get some properties defined for the format: https://github.com/vcstuff/oid4vc-haip-sd-jwt-vc/issues/63
@nklomp do you agree with it being an empty object for now, or should we also allow the client metadata values (
sd-jwt_alg_values
andkb-jwt_alg_values
) in the PD?