Closed CGonzC closed 9 months ago
Hi,
The SpikeInterface unit IDs and ok phy IDs are not the same. See this issue: https://github.com/SpikeInterface/spikeinterface/issues/2426
To get the original phy IDs, you can do : sorting.get_property("original_cluster_id")
Also, in the phy unit_table you should have an si_unit_id
column if you exported with SI, with the SpikeInterface unit Id corresponding to the unit
Hi Alessio,
Thank you very much! that was very fast! I'm clear now :) Thank you very much again!
Cristian
No worries! Closing then :)
Hi everybody,
I am confused since I noticed a mismatch in the channel maps generated in my Jupyter notebook and Phy reading the same kilosort2.5 sorting_output. For example, in the attached screenshots, two selected clusters are detected in channel 41 and 43 (42 and 43 in my OE). In the Jupyter notebook they are shown close together but in Phy far away. In the Jupyter widget the positions seem to coincide with the "contact id" of the probe, whereas in Phy they are shown in the expected position according to the OE channels. I'm using a Cambridge Neurotech ASSY-77-H10, wired via ASSY-77>Adpt.A64-Om32_2x-sm-NN>RHD2164.
What do you think could be the problem here? What am I missing or ignoring? I would appreciate your help! Thank you very much in advance Cristian