Adding support for Xyloni PCB

[surabibio]

Added Xyloni PCB for SaxonSoc. The scala code is in a flat format. I found great difficulty in understanding the flow of Abstract Classes and Objects. Most hardware engineers I believe will feel the same. Hence a new flat format and I hope you will accept it.

[Dolu1990]

Hi,

I found great difficulty in understanding the flow of Abstract Classes and Objects. Most hardware engineers I believe will feel the same.

Yes i understand, the SaxonSoc was quite experimental for a long time, and had quite a few paradigme shift on the flight. So, it is far from being perfect / clean XD

At the end, the main thing emerging out of it is the fiber framework (Handle / hardFork) : https://spinalhdl.github.io/SpinalDoc-RTD/master/SpinalHDL/Libraries/fiber.html?highlight=fork

About the PR itself, from which branch did you developed it ? master ? not dev-0.3 ?

Also it seems the PR contains some of the SBT / Scala compilation files ?

[surabibio]

Hi Charles,

Thankyou for your mail. You are doing a great job and without SpinalHdl we would have been broke by now.

We ported over 17 years of AHDL code on a Cyclone FPGA to SpinalHdl in an Effinix Trion FPGA in 3 months. We shipped 6 units so far and I am very grateful to you.

Your work is a life time achievement inspiration.

I developed from dev-0.3. I can confirm it works great and we have field tested code.

The PR is incomplete and you can ignore it for now. There are a few more functionalities that I want to add.

I will submit a clean and complete PR in the days to come.

Thanks once again for your attention.

Ravi

From: Dolu1990 @.> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 3:27 PM To: SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc @.> Cc: surabibio @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc] Adding support for Xyloni PCB (PR #73)

Hi,

I found great difficulty in understanding the flow of Abstract Classes and Objects. Most hardware engineers I believe will feel the same.

Yes i understand, the SaxonSoc was quite experimental for a long time, and had quite a few paradigme shift on the flight. So, it is far from being perfect / clean XD

At the end, the main thing emerging out of it is the fiber framework (Handle / hardFork) : https://spinalhdl.github.io/SpinalDoc-RTD/master/SpinalHDL/Libraries/fiber.html?highlight=fork

About the PR itself, from which branch did you developed it ? master ? not dev-0.3 ?

Also it seems the PR contains some of the SBT / Scala compilation files ?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc/pull/73#issuecomment-1147271728 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGK6C3TS42DXLFN7F6QJYQ3VNXDQHANCNFSM5X5WBKWA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

[Dolu1990]

Your work is a life time achievement inspiration.

Thanks :)

I developed from dev-0.3. I can confirm it works great and we have field tested code.

Ahh, then,don't forget to select dev-0.3 branch as destination branch for the PR. This PR is currently targeting master branch, which is years behind dev-0.3

I will submit a clean and complete PR in the days to come.

Ok :D

Regards Charles

[surabibio]

Hi Charles,

I have submitted a new PR with video walkthrough.

Please consider the PR,

BR,

Ravi Ganesh

From: Dolu1990 @.> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 3:27 PM To: SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc @.> Cc: surabibio @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc] Adding support for Xyloni PCB (PR #73)

Hi,

I found great difficulty in understanding the flow of Abstract Classes and Objects. Most hardware engineers I believe will feel the same.

Yes i understand, the SaxonSoc was quite experimental for a long time, and had quite a few paradigme shift on the flight. So, it is far from being perfect / clean XD

At the end, the main thing emerging out of it is the fiber framework (Handle / hardFork) : https://spinalhdl.github.io/SpinalDoc-RTD/master/SpinalHDL/Libraries/fiber.html?highlight=fork

About the PR itself, from which branch did you developed it ? master ? not dev-0.3 ?

Also it seems the PR contains some of the SBT / Scala compilation files ?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc/pull/73#issuecomment-1147271728 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGK6C3TS42DXLFN7F6QJYQ3VNXDQHANCNFSM5X5WBKWA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

[surabibio]

Hi,

Is there any issue with my PR. It is not merged.

Awaiting your feedback.

Ravi Ganesh

From: @. @.> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 2:43 AM To: 'SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc' @.***> Subject: RE: [SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc] Adding support for Xyloni PCB (PR #73)

Hi Charles,

I have submitted a new PR with video walkthrough.

Please consider the PR,

BR,

Ravi Ganesh

From: Dolu1990 @. @.> > Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 3:27 PM To: SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc @. @.> > Cc: surabibio @. @.> >; Author @. @.> > Subject: Re: [SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc] Adding support for Xyloni PCB (PR #73)

Hi,

I found great difficulty in understanding the flow of Abstract Classes and Objects. Most hardware engineers I believe will feel the same.

Yes i understand, the SaxonSoc was quite experimental for a long time, and had quite a few paradigme shift on the flight. So, it is far from being perfect / clean XD

At the end, the main thing emerging out of it is the fiber framework (Handle / hardFork) : https://spinalhdl.github.io/SpinalDoc-RTD/master/SpinalHDL/Libraries/fiber.html?highlight=fork

About the PR itself, from which branch did you developed it ? master ? not dev-0.3 ?

Also it seems the PR contains some of the SBT / Scala compilation files ?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc/pull/73#issuecomment-1147271728 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGK6C3TS42DXLFN7F6QJYQ3VNXDQHANCNFSM5X5WBKWA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @. @.> >

[Dolu1990]

Sorry for the delay, i just sent a message here : https://github.com/SpinalHDL/SaxonSoc/pull/74#issuecomment-1158862422