Open alexander-yevsyukov opened 1 year ago
Suppose, I have the following type definition:
message Range { int32 min_value = 1; int32 max_value = 2; }
Obviously, the following should apply: 1) min_value <= max_value 2) max_value >= min_value, which is just an opposite of the item 1.
min_value <= max_value
max_value >= min_value
Can we do it now like this?
message Range { int32 min_value = 1 [(max).value = "max_value"]; // using optional `this.` prefix is also desired. int32 max_value = 2; }
message NumberGenerated { int32 number = 1 [(min).value = "range.min_value", (max).value = "range.max_value"]; Range range = 2 [(required) = true]; }
I've just tested it with NumberGenerated in a testFixtures of core-java project. We don't handle this case yet. No code is generated.
NumberGenerated
testFixtures
core-java
Suppose, I have the following type definition:
Obviously, the following should apply: 1)
min_value <= max_value
2)max_value >= min_value
, which is just an opposite of the item 1.Can we do it now like this?