Rename inconsistent population label

[scp93ch]

Population labels are currently:

• singleton
• a few
• more
• many
• very many

I think "more" is weird: it is a relative term, not absolute. Could we rename it to "some"? I realise "some" strictly only means more than 1, but I can't think of anything better.

[mike1813]

@scp93ch : go for it.

[mike1813]

Google suggests 'quite a few' is more than 'a few' but less than 'many'.

[mike1813]

Other options? We could:

• just remove 'more' and go with only 4 levels, with suitable updates to the descriptions of each level
• remove 'more' and add another level above 'very many' (but we need a name for it), again with suitable updates of the descriptions
• replace all the labels apart from 'singleton' by an inequality or an order of magnitude expression

In all but the last of these, we would probably also need to update the lookup table functions provided by the querier.

[samuelsenior]

I think relabelling 'more' to something more appropriate makes the most sense to do.

Removing the level 'more' would make the population levels inconsistent with the mathematical modelling so wouldn't be possible without substantially reworking the mathematical modelling, and removing 'more' whilst adding another level above 'very many' would be just the same as relabelling 'more' and shifting the labels around due to how the mathematical modelling works. Replacing the labels with inequalities is possible, but my initial feeling is that these would be better suited to be in a tool tip since it would be a step away from linguistic representations if the labels were updated to them.

In terms of what 'more' could be relabelled to, I can see 'quite a few' being a better label and working well.