Open lmguzman opened 7 years ago
Also, Macae 2008 visit ID 211 has non sense coordinates that fall on the water. This are the correct coordinates for Macae: -22.2075 -41.4847
@lmguzman I've been thinking about this. If i understand correctly, the dataset table seems to be correct -- it is just the lat/long in the visit table that seems to be wrong? In that case, what if we just use the dataset lat/long for any analyses? This could be a temporary fix while we wait for the dataset owners to fix these.
the lat long on sonadora and quintana roo are correct on the dataset table but not on the visit table On the visit table they need the long * -1