In the current funding vault implementation, we use ratio voting, meaning the amount of funding a proposal receives depends on the ratio of the total votes used for that particular funding vault.
Example:
A has 30% of the total voting tokens used for a funding vault.
B has 70% of the total voting tokens used for a funding vault.
Ideally, If both A and B register and use their voting power, A will control 30% of the funds and B will control 70%.
However:
If only A registers and uses their voting tokens to acquire voting power tokens, A gains full control of the funds in the funding vault. This situation may lead to unintended consequences.
We need to discuss whether this should be fixed or if it can be considered a feature. If it is considered a feature, we need solid justification for this approach.
In the current funding vault implementation, we use ratio voting, meaning the amount of funding a proposal receives depends on the ratio of the total votes used for that particular funding vault.
Example:
A has 30% of the total voting tokens used for a funding vault.
B has 70% of the total voting tokens used for a funding vault.
Ideally, If both A and B register and use their voting power, A will control 30% of the funds and B will control 70%.
However:
If only A registers and uses their voting tokens to acquire voting power tokens, A gains full control of the funds in the funding vault. This situation may lead to unintended consequences.
We need to discuss whether this should be fixed or if it can be considered a feature. If it is considered a feature, we need solid justification for this approach.