Closed arm4b closed 3 years ago
+1
I'll abstain at this point (aka +0) since I don't think I added much of value to those discussions.
Before voting, some grammar points on: https://stackstorm.com/partners-program/
The removal/addition of companies to partners page "StackStorm or the partner may choose to end the partnership at any time". Does "StackStorm" here have a defined meaning, is this by majority vote of StackStorm TSC?
Interested in discussing if indemnification clause is needed at TSC meeting.
Agreed; before voting IMHO, we need to set some ground rules for the partners page: As of today there is no link to the partners page from the main page http://stackstorm.com, need to first add that On the partner landing page have a list of current partners and also have a “How To Become A Partner” section In the “How To Become A Partner” page also highlight what the project will give back to the partner more clearly as the current 1 paragraph is not very descriptive The contributions should be categorized as per the function, right now in the proposed page it is very ambiguous I would also like to ask the team to consider the badge system I proposed, if not being adopted, propose a mechanism that would provide differentiation between partners based on the contributions Only after these are addressed is the Partner Page agenda item is ready to vote.
Regds Ravi
------ Original Message ------ From: "Amanda McGuinness" @.> To: "StackStorm/discussions" @.> Cc: "raviorch" @.>; "Mention" @.> Sent: 4/6/2021 8:54:37 AM Subject: Re: [StackStorm/discussions] TSC Vote: StackStorm Partnership Program (#72)
Before voting, some grammar points on: https://stackstorm.com/partners-program/
"We welcome everyone to help and support the project is it maintenance"
- not sure about the "is it ...", should it be "be it" The link to policies at bottom seems a bit on its own, just after the Contact Us The removal/addition of companies to partners page "StackStorm or the partner may choose to end the partnership at any time". Does "StackStorm" here have a defined meaning, is this by majority vote of StackStorm TSC?
Interested in discussing if indemnification clause is needed at TSC meeting.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/StackStorm/discussions/issues/72#issuecomment-814233249, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQHYO6QBEEOD73NEUOIYZJ3THMVDZANCNFSM42JHUTXQ.
It sounds like we need to take this discussion to a subcommittee.
@raviorch Can you also officially create your own proposal of exactly what you think the partners program should look like?
Can absolutely do it, will work with the team to create a subcommittee and move forward. Ravi ------ Original Message ------ From: "blag" @.> To: "StackStorm/discussions" @.> Cc: "raviorch" @.>; "Mention" @.> Sent: 4/6/2021 9:32:23 AM Subject: Re: [StackStorm/discussions] TSC Vote: StackStorm Partnership Program (#72)
It sounds like we need to take this discussion to a subcommittee.
@.*** https://github.com/raviorch Can you also officially create your own proposal of exactly what you think the partners program should look like?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/StackStorm/discussions/issues/72#issuecomment-814260809, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQHYO6URKUH7LGIS77JM4PLTHMZRPANCNFSM42JHUTXQ.
I also believe we need to have a subcommittee to flush this out.
Subcommitte issue started here: https://github.com/StackStorm/discussions/issues/73
Closing as not approved by the TSC after 7 days of the voting period.
TSC Meeting Decision (https://github.com/StackStorm/discussions/issues/71) was to continue the discussion in https://github.com/StackStorm/discussions/issues/73. Partners sub-committee has to re-iterate on the program and come up with a proposal for the next (May) TSC Meeting. Another Discussion should be created for the StackStorm TSC to Vote.
Following almost 1 year of discussions, more than 6 TSC Meetings, consultations with the Partners, discussions with the LF, and additional approval from the LF Legal I'd like to invite @StackStorm/tsc to vote on approving the StackStorm Partnership program.
The plan:
Additional sub-committees, multi-level tiers of the programs and are outside of this scope and could be discussed and progressed in future iterations.
Related Discussions:
@StackStorm/tsc Voting period per Governance is 1 week and needs a majority of votes from the TSC voting pool to approve.