Closed sunset1995 closed 7 months ago
Hi Cheng,
Thanks for the update and nice work! I've verified the scores and uploaded them to the website now.
Best, Zhengfei
Hi Zhengfei,
Thanks for organizing the benchmark!
One question about the shape results. The chamfer distance from my evaluation result is 0.214 * 1e-3
but it appears to be 0.43 * 1e-3
on the website table. Do I misinterpret the result? If it is, I have to fix it in our arxiv version as well.
"shape": {
"bidir_chamfer": [
0.0002145684793258237,
0.0002457779565475051
],
"scene_count": 42
}
Best, Cheng
Hi Cheng,
In fact, we multiplied the chamfer distances with 2x10^3 to get the table numbers, which is a bit different from what we stated in the paper. Sorry for the confusion. We'll update this repo's document very soon.
Best, Zhengfei
Got it. I will correct the number in our arxiv version.
Thanks for publishing the awesome datasets! I want to upload the results by our ICCV 2023 paper --- Neural-PBIR Reconstruction of Shape, Material, and Illumination. Below are the detailed of our results:
neural-pbir
python -m scripts.test --input-path "$folder"/neural-pbir-eval-inputs.json --output-path "$folder"/neural-pbir-eval-outputs.json --scenes full