Fix appearance of AccountSetup Header when only using identity provider

[Supereg]

Fix appearance of AccountSetup Header when only using identity provider

:recycle: Current situation & Problem

There was a faulty check resulting in the AccountSetup Header not being displayed when only using Identity Provider.

:gear: Release Notes

• Fixed an issue where the AccountSetup Header wouldn't be displayed with only using identity provider.

:books: Documentation

--

:white_check_mark: Testing

We added another permutation in the Preview section.

:pencil: Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By submitting creating this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• [x] I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[Supereg]

This fixes your issue @vishnuravi

[vishnuravi]

This fixes your issue @vishnuravi

Thank you @Supereg!

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.12%. Comparing base (83f505c) to head (dd77a9b).

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/58?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #58 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 76.18% 76.12% -0.05% ========================================== Files 116 116 Lines 4017 4020 +3 ========================================== Hits 3060 3060 - Misses 957 960 +3 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/58?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Sources/SpeziAccount/Account.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/58?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=Sources%2FSpeziAccount%2FAccount.swift&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi#diff-U291cmNlcy9TcGV6aUFjY291bnQvQWNjb3VudC5zd2lmdA==) | `77.20% <ø> (ø)` | | | [Sources/SpeziAccount/AccountSetup.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/58?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=Sources%2FSpeziAccount%2FAccountSetup.swift&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi#diff-U291cmNlcy9TcGV6aUFjY291bnQvQWNjb3VudFNldHVwLnN3aWZ0) | `68.64% <25.00%> (-1.24%)` | :arrow_down: | ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/58?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/58?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). Last update [83f505c...dd77a9b](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/58?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi).