Fix AccountSetup closure not getting called when anonymous details are associated

[Supereg]

Fix AccountSetup closure not getting called when anonymous details are associated

:recycle: Current situation & Problem

The AccountSetup inconsistently treated anonymous account details (still showing the setup views but not reacting to changes when going from anonymous to non-anonymous). This is fixed by this PR.

:gear: Release Notes

• Fixed account setup closure not being called if anonymous details were previously associated.

:books: Documentation

--

:white_check_mark: Testing

--

:pencil: Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By submitting creating this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• [x] I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 84.44%. Comparing base (6b38140) to head (78e4456). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/63?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #63 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 84.46% 84.44% -0.01% ========================================== Files 120 120 Lines 5204 5205 +1 ========================================== Hits 4395 4395 - Misses 809 810 +1 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/63?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Sources/SpeziAccount/AccountSetup.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/63?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=Sources%2FSpeziAccount%2FAccountSetup.swift&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi#diff-U291cmNlcy9TcGV6aUFjY291bnQvQWNjb3VudFNldHVwLnN3aWZ0) | `92.08% <100.00%> (+0.05%)` | :arrow_up: | ... and [1 file with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/63/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/63?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/63?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). Last update [6b38140...78e4456](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziAccount/pull/63?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi).