Upgrade Spezi to 0.8.0

[Supereg]

Upgrade Spezi to 0.8.0

:recycle: Current situation & Problem

This PR upgrades to Spezi 0.8.0 and moves to observable.

As discussed, this PR removes the Questionnaire Standard Constraint, as we identified that questionnaire responses typically require local context (e.g., the current selected patient). Therefore, questionnaire completion shall always be handled through the closure.

:gear: Release Notes

• Migrate to Observable
• Upgrade to Spezi 0.8.0
• Introduce a new QuestionnaireResult type, received via the closure
• Removed the Standard constraints.

:books: Documentation

Documentation was updated and respective parts were removed.

:white_check_mark: Testing

--

:pencil: Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By submitting creating this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• [x] I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #18 (d65394b) into main (7318923) will decrease coverage by 1.35%. The diff coverage is 75.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziQuestionnaire/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #18 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 88.38% 87.02% -1.35% ========================================== Files 3 2 -1 Lines 86 77 -9 ========================================== - Hits 76 67 -9 Misses 10 10 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziQuestionnaire/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Sources/SpeziQuestionnaire/QuestionnaireView.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziQuestionnaire/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi#diff-U291cmNlcy9TcGV6aVF1ZXN0aW9ubmFpcmUvUXVlc3Rpb25uYWlyZVZpZXcuc3dpZnQ=) | `85.72% <75.00%> (+4.77%)` | :arrow_up: | | [...ources/SpeziQuestionnaire/ORKOrderedTaskView.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziQuestionnaire/pull/18?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi#diff-U291cmNlcy9TcGV6aVF1ZXN0aW9ubmFpcmUvT1JLT3JkZXJlZFRhc2tWaWV3LnN3aWZ0) | `88.10% <75.00%> (-6.90%)` | :arrow_down: | ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziQuestionnaire/pull/18?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziQuestionnaire/pull/18?src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). Last update [7318923...d65394b](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziQuestionnaire/pull/18?src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi).

[Supereg]

We have a slightly reduced diff coverage due to the new state handling which is not fully covered by the UI tests (see GitHub review diff). Would it make sense to force merge @PSchmiedmayer?

[PSchmiedmayer]

Sure, merged @Supereg 👍