Fix skip logic and validation in Social Support Questionnaire

[vishnuravi]

Fixes Social Support Questionnaire

:recycle: Current situation & Problem

The Social Support Questionnaire which is provided as an example survey in the Spezi Template Application has several issues:

• The survey ends prematurely after the question regarding the user's preferred contact method because the enable-when expressions are not written correctly.
• Field validation fails due to an incorrect extension URI in multiple fields and an invalid regular expression for validating a US phone number.

:bulb: Proposed solution

• Fixes the enable-when expressions to show the appropriate follow-up question after the preferred contact method is selected.
• Uses the correct extension URI which is recognized by ResearchKitOnFHIR and fixes the regular expression.

Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By submitting creating this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• [X] I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #33 (13a39a4) into main (2f274d7) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziTemplateApplication/pull/33?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #33 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 80.86% 80.86% ======================================= Files 30 30 Lines 815 815 ======================================= Hits 659 659 Misses 156 156 ``` ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziTemplateApplication/pull/33?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziTemplateApplication/pull/33?src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). Last update [2f274d7...13a39a4](https://app.codecov.io/gh/StanfordSpezi/SpeziTemplateApplication/pull/33?src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=StanfordSpezi).

[vishnuravi]

@PSchmiedmayer I've incorporated your and @Supereg's feedback regarding the email regex. All tests have passed, however, there seems to be a configuration issue with CodeQL which is preventing the PR from being merged currently. Please take a look when you get a chance. Thanks.