Closed zamyers closed 3 years ago
Great comment -- this gets at the difference between an impulse response and a pulse response. The impulse response will typically have a large magnitude, since it is the derivative of the step response, which is very fast. I think that you mostly likely want to use the pulse response instead, which is the channel response to a single "1" bit spanning a unit interval.
I added some code to the s4p
branch that makes it straightforward to do this, using our existing Channel
class:
chan = Channel(channel_type='s4p', sampl_rate=10e12, resp_depth=200000,
s4p=file_name, zs=50, zl=50)
_, pulse = chan.get_pulse_resp(f_sig=16e9, resp_depth=250, t_delay=0)
Pulse Response is a suitable solution.
When you use the s4p_to_impulse, the resulting output is very large (proportional) ~ with cursor peaks of 1e9.
I assume this falls out of some inverse FFT somewhere not being normalized by the number of bins?