Open rohankrao opened 4 months ago
@rohankrao Thanks for this suggestion, I wonder whether or not you have put starrocks over Iceberg in production?
No, not in production. This feature will help in production.
On Tue, 23 Jul, 2024, 2:45 am alvin, @.***> wrote:
@rohankrao https://github.com/rohankrao Thanks for this suggestion, I wonder whether or not you have put starrocks over Iceberg in production?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/StarRocks/starrocks/issues/48736#issuecomment-2243826958, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADXIE2BD3EUTCSTPZO4KMRTZNVY6TAVCNFSM6AAAAABLIX3GOWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENBTHAZDMOJVHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@rohankrao Which do you want, a fully managed compaction service or just a compaction interface you can integrated into your schedule system?
I will prefer a manual compaction command like you have for native tables. I am writing into iceberg from kafka externally and can trigger compaction when needed. Instead of using spark to do housekeeping, I want to use SR for that.
It would be beneficial if StarRocks supported Iceberg table maintenance features such as optimization, expiring snapshots, and removing orphan files.
Starrocks supports writing into iceberg tables. It will be nice if starrocks supports iceberg table housekeeping.
Feature request
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context