Closed dirtysalt closed 7 hours ago
Issues
4 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
:white_check_mark: pass : 0 / 0 (0%)
:white_check_mark: pass : 19 / 19 (100.00%)
path | covered_line | new_line | coverage | not_covered_line_detail | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/server/MetadataMgr.java | 2 | 2 | 100.00% | [] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/planner/IcebergScanNode.java | 3 | 3 | 100.00% | [] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/connector/ConnectorMetadatRequestContext.java | 6 | 6 | 100.00% | [] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/connector/iceberg/IcebergMetadata.java | 1 | 1 | 100.00% | [] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/connector/partitiontraits/IcebergPartitionTraits.java | 5 | 5 | 100.00% | [] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/connector/CatalogConnectorMetadata.java | 1 | 1 | 100.00% | [] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/connector/unified/UnifiedMetadata.java | 1 | 1 | 100.00% | [] |
:white_check_mark: pass : 0 / 0 (0%)
@mergify backport branch-3.4
backport branch-3.4
Why I'm doing:
What I'm doing:
Add
ConnectorMetadataRquest
to simplify interfaces. So I can add more variables without rewriting interfaces.Fixes #issue
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist:
Bugfix cherry-pick branch check: