Open LiShuMing opened 3 days ago
Issues
16 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
:white_check_mark: pass : 0 / 0 (0%)
:white_check_mark: pass : 0 / 0 (0%)
:white_check_mark: pass : 198 / 241 (82.16%)
path | covered_line | new_line | coverage | not_covered_line_detail | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/common/util/DynamicPartitionUtil.java | 24 | 43 | 55.81% | [453, 471, 472, 473, 474, 477, 478, 479, 480, 482, 484, 491, 493, 494, 504, 505, 506, 508, 516] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/clone/DynamicPartitionScheduler.java | 14 | 18 | 77.78% | [219, 220, 382, 431] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/clone/PartitionTTLScheduler.java | 128 | 144 | 88.89% | [131, 132, 146, 147, 148, 158, 179, 181, 182, 183, 195, 206, 210, 218, 232, 272] |
:large_blue_circle: | com/starrocks/clone/SchedulerRuntimeInfoCollector.java | 32 | 36 | 88.89% | [82, 83, 84, 85] |
Why I'm doing:
DynamicPartitionScheduler
only supportsRange Partition
Tables, and the limitations are not clear to support list partition ttl scheduler.What I'm doing:
PartitionTTLScheduler
andSchedulerRuntimeInfoCollector
fromDynamicPartitionScheduler
Fixes https://github.com/StarRocks/starrocks/issues/53117
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist:
Bugfix cherry-pick branch check: