Potential Change of Plan: Alternate Syntax

[LB--]

I was thinking that maybe it would make more sense to use a lisp-like syntax instead of a C++-like syntax.

• function call, no args: (func-name;)
• function call, w/ args: (func-name; arg1, arg2, arg3)
• normal expression: (v1 + v2 - v3)
• parameter pack: (; param1, param2, param3)

[LB--]

Where func-name is expected some special syntax could be allowed but I have not decided what yet.

To simplify chaining function calls, this syntax can be used:

• (d; c; b; a; params)