Closed insilentio closed 1 year ago
My comments to reviewer's input in italic:
Overall
- no errors found; only minor suggestions (see below)
- an overall workflow (first KaReB_Datenaufbereitung.egp, second BEV570.egp etc) and/or a documentation were helpful for process traceability
- in reviews it were helpful to see (at the very beginning of the review) the plots as well; I prefer to keep the plots
not sure what you mean: add plots to github?
KaReB_Datenaufbereitung.egp
- KaReB_Datenaufbereitung.egp: SAS-Code is ok; however, we should avoid manual steps in future (e.g. copy and manipulate Excel files)
- Only keep needed process flows (probably process flow 3 only)
BEV570.egp
- name: BEV570.egp; better not to use a SASA name; different content = different name
- error messages in the OGD to HDB program; why? who made this code? Ugly coding style
for the SAS part probably best if you could show me live what you mean
1504_output_ssd.r file renaming is peculiar (but idea is ok; kareb2040 as base areas; kareb2016 as reference); unconvenient: the code cannot be run multiple times (since the files are renamed)
added an if-statement to be able to run it
- line 40: pop_middle does not exist? first run the entire code for BZO2016? Code should run without additional files
added comment
- after running lines 44 to 46 (run_scen), I had no object pop_middle; what went wrong? Consequently, I can only run the population comparison plots with dummy data
_added sourcing of 1501_modeloutput.r
- line 51: better case_when (for 3 or more classes)
changed
- line 62 (and before): why another folder 'requests'? We already have a folder for outputs
I think it is a good idea to keep default outputs and customer request based outputs separate
- line 70: why not bind_rows?
don't know, I like union :-)
- line 114: I can not open plot 15A2_car_dcat; what went wrong?
probably some mix-up with the plot fix branch? I included the changed plot function into this branch and re-ran the plots; they work here
- line 144: same here (plot 15A4_bzo40_last_2_years_per district)
see above
- line 199: not possible to run (since I use GitHub on my own laptop)
I can send you the file if needed
Results
- I corrected minor typos (e.g. year)
- BevSzen as additional source
directly in the Excel or where?
reviewer confirmed re-approval via phone
code for customer request 5839-01