Closed Ndrinta closed 2 years ago
Thanks for these - will review!
Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg
From: Ndrinta @.> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 3:30:30 PM To: StealthChesnut/HA-FoxESS-Modbus @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: [StealthChesnut/HA-FoxESS-Modbus] Fixing typo (PR #44)
In the definition of the sensor system_losses there is a typo in the usage of sensor.feed_in_power. It's now been fixed.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/StealthChesnut/HA-FoxESS-Modbus/pull/44
Commit Summary
File Changes
(1 filehttps://github.com/StealthChesnut/HA-FoxESS-Modbus/pull/44/files)
Patch Links:
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/StealthChesnut/HA-FoxESS-Modbus/pull/44, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALFO3FHKFYVSTWZEHPXZ573V3NSXNANCNFSM573CQJXA. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Wait, I don't think I understand.
In configuration.yaml
you define a template sensor named feed_in_power
.
Then you define another template sensor named system_losses
which uses a non-existent sensor named sensor.feedin_power
.
Either you change the actual sensor name or its usage in the system_losses
's value_template
definition.
Aha - I'll re-check it. Thanks for coming back with the extra info.
It's alright. If I may, can we come up with a solution and you let me do another pull request? I'm looking forward to committing my first actual bug fix 😊 cheers
@StealthChesnut Chris, this is a change to the original code which was feedin_power, if I'm not mistaken? This link contains some dialogue when the losses sensor was being discussed. Unless it was just my config that was called feedin_power. https://github.com/StealthChesnut/HA-FoxESS-Modbus/discussions/9
I guess as long as it's consistent throughout it doesn't matter. If I have to reinstall this I'll check any templates that use feedin_power.
It is. I currently have feed_in_power as the sensor name in my live config, so I was going to go with accepting the change here. I'm not sure where along the lines that's got changed if yours is feedin_power.
@StealthChesnut Ignore me! Looking back at earlier code it seems it was feed_in_power from before or around V1.0!? Guess my feedin_power was from the earlier work, hence the issue with the losses sensor, as that's what I called it in there. Ooops.
Haha - no probs!
In the definition of the sensor system_losses there is a typo in the usage of sensor.feed_in_power. It's now been fixed.