Closed ffries closed 1 year ago
Hi!
If you live in France, do you know the CentipedeRTK Project ? RTKBase is directly connected with this open network.
Sorry for the confusion, I am planning to use my Lorawan casing (where I have PoE), nothing more.
Yes I am planning to join CentipedeRTK Project. Therefore I don't need a roaming solution with a base and a rover. Only a simple base (I renamed the post) to participate in the project.
The Uputronics Hat can output RAW streams as written here: https://store.uputronics.com/files/Uputronics%20Raspberry%20Pi%20GPS%20RTC%20Board%20Datasheet.pdf
Is a recent RTK chip like the F9P really needed for my project (only need a base for CentipedeRTK)?
Kind regards, Ffries
Here is my BOM (if the Uputronic hat is suitable) that I ordered:
Around 130€ total. This could divide cost by 3.
If you already have this Uputronics Hat, you can play with it and try Rtkbase. If you don't have it, don't waste your money.
Dear Stefal, No I don't have the Uputronics Hat, but I just ordered it (before reading your message).
Are there technical reasons why we can't go with an older M8 chip for a CentripedeRTK base station? I am aware that I need to wait a few hours before reaching centimeter precision. But does it really matter ?
Kind regards, Ffries
With L1 only receivers (base and rover), it take a long time to get a RTK Fix, and you will lose this Fix very easily. Moving from L1 to L1/L2 receiver is like upgrading your internet connection from adsl to optical fiber.
Thank you for clarification. I found this information: https://gnss.store/blog/post/rtk-ppp-and-autonomous.html
My centripedeRTK base will be mounted on a pole so it does not move.
A modern GNSS RTK receiver with two channels cost only 150EUR to 200EUR and it can reach centimeter precision in a matter of seconds. It might not be interesting to use software RTK as it can take hours an I may never reach the same precision as it is single channel. Furthermore RTK is no longer actively maintained since 2017 ... All work is focusing on hardware. Also I understand that admins are worried that I might provide bad data to the centripedeRTK project if my station moves. So it might not be possible to participate with software RTK. Simple as that ...
However I can always try and buy a new GNSS if it goes wrong.
So I am closing the issue and will report when finished.
Kind regards, FFries
Dear all,
I just discovered your project and I would like to set-up a base station for my local community in rural area in France. It would be nice along my LoraWan station to provide precise GPS. I am not planning to use precise positioning myself.
Reading the documentation Gnss receiver (F9P) is detected automatically but it would make sense to use a cheaper and older Ublox M8 chip for base. It does not sound clear to me whether ublox hardware returning RAW Output available via UBX-RXM-RAWX Message would be suitable for RTKLIB.
In particular I purchased Uputronics Raspberry pie hat: the https://store.uputronics.com/files/Uputronics%20Raspberry%20Pi%20GPS%20RTC%20Board%20Datasheet.pdf
According to docs it supports RAWX and is supported by the Raspberry Pi 2/3/4. I am also planning to use a Raspberry Pi 2B which is still available cheap new or used (RP 3 and 4 are all out of stock as of writing).
So it would make a suitable base station for 20€ (Raspberry Pi 2B) and Uputronics Raspberry pie hat (50€). Do you think it will work with RTKlib? Both are made of European components. It would drive the cost to 70€ and maybe 100€ if you find a cheap antenna.
Does it sound interesting and do you think it is worth testing?
Kind regards, FFries