Open alex-w opened 6 years ago
Some of the numbers should be given only when accuracy issues have been solved. Else people would start using Stellarium as reference solution...
Maybe overkill, but a dialog could be shown that warns the user about the accuracy of the graphs, or some other way to indicate that accuracy is not good for reference use? Just freewheeling: how about making the lines thicker, as fine lines imply high accuracy?
@axd1967 Do you want to confirm a dialog for every numerical result that is technically wrong in the last displayed decimal figure? You will hurt your index finger from clicking.
Appendix F in the Stellarium User Guide is where you find accuracy estimates. As long as the version number is 0.*, you should not use Stellarium as reference source for numerical ephemerides.
No... I was thinking about a one-time dialog with a checkbox that allows the user to hide it "forever" (or until reset by some other means). The dialog could contain one or more hyperlinks to one of these:
I made such a one-time warning for users with too old computers that they should expect graphic problems. Those still reported about graphics problems. "Ah yes, there was some warning, but I clicked continue". Do you think anybody cares for what they confirmed when accepting some popup dialog that you see once just after installation or at first run?
Couple features are implemented in main code already:
Plus one feature is implemented in debug mode:
Probably we may add it in the release mode too, but... how it really necessary?
What is "Degree of subtention" in astronomical application?
I mark last item as solved due AstroCalc tool
Original report by Keatah: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stellarium/+bug/1045297
Observability Analysis plugin (ideas for more features)
Things to add to the plugin: