Closed packet-rat closed 5 years ago
Yes this was a known issue during the first iteration. Needs to be fixed in second round. Is it causing issues in validation?
Not with static validation. However, we are considering use of your tool for populating test data sets where temporal consistency is required for inferencing and reasoning validation. In the meantime keep up the great work as your tool has already proven to be invaluable.
@packet-rat give https://github.com/StephenOTT/STIX-Faker/releases/tag/0.7.0 a try.
This update introduces what i believe to be proper random dates with the requested fixes for Temporality/Causality inconsistencies.
Please close if it fixes it up!
@packet-rat were you able to test it out?
Sorry -- I missed this update on April 15th (I was immersed with the tax man for a few days). I'll have a look sometime this week.
Pat Maroney
On Apr 22, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Stephen Russett notifications@github.com wrote:
@packet-rat https://github.com/packet-rat were you able to test it out?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/StephenOTT/STIX-Faker/issues/8#issuecomment-485409468, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYSFYIELF7OT2ALOOFFLRDPRWXPPANCNFSM4HGAMGZA.
reopen if its a issue, but i believe its fixed
Dates/Times generated have temporal/causality inconsistency:
For example generated "sightings" show
last_observed
timestamp beforefirst_observed