Closed peanut256 closed 7 years ago
Thanks for spotting this! I'm a bit surprised that the approach with rfind('.')
stopped working. Did they change their version string format? Do they have kind of nano-version number now?
It looks like new minor versions just omit the revision number, i.e. 10.12 instead of 10.12.0. If you'd like a more adaptive approach than taking the first five characters, you could use a regex like ^([0-9]+.[0-9]+)
Alright, I see. Thanks for the fix. I think, the simple version is sufficient.
Fixed bug in demo scripts caused by missing macOS revision number