ODF2PDFViaITextConverter only uses first page header and standard header was ignored and replaced by the first page header

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.InputStream in = new FileInputStream(new File("sample.odt"));
2.Options 
options=Options.getTo(ConverterTypeTo.PDF).via(ConverterTypeVia.ITEXT);
3. OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(new File("sample.pdf"));
4. ODF2PDFViaITextConverter.getInstance().convert(in, out, options);

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
As the sample.odt has first page header different from subsequent page header 
the the resulting pdf file should have two different headers but, on the pdt 
file produced, all the pages have the same header, which is the first page 
header.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
ODFDOM v.0.88 | xdocreport v. 0.97 | Linux mint 13 (Ubuntu 12.04)

Please provide any additional information below.
Same situation occurs with report.convert(context, options, out); when context 
is based on an odt template with two different headers

Original issue reported on code.google.com by GeorgeWa...@gmail.com on 23 Jun 2012 at 3:27

• Merged into: #102

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi George,

Could you attach your odt please.
Many thank's

@Leszek:could you see the problem please if you have time. Many Than's

Regards Angelo

Original comment by angelo.z...@gmail.com on 23 Jun 2012 at 3:46

• Changed state: Accepted

[GoogleCodeExporter]

George

I've fixed similar problem in 0.9.8 version.
See http://code.google.com/p/xdocreport/issues/detail?id=102
However 0.9.8 is not officially released yet.
Could you try your example with 0.9.8 SNAPSHOT?
If not please provide your *.odt example. I could look at it.
Regards
Leszek

Original comment by abe...@gmail.com on 25 Jun 2012 at 8:12

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by angelo.z...@gmail.com on 27 Jun 2012 at 11:15

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Since George did not provided any new material to this bug
I consider this bug as a duplicate of issue 102 and close it.
Issue 102 was fixed in 0.9.8 version

Original comment by abe...@gmail.com on 7 Aug 2012 at 11:28

• Changed state: Duplicate