Open winter0707winter opened 3 months ago
Application is waiting for allocator review
Thank you for opening this issue. Could you please provide more information to help us better understand the situation? Are you a data preparer? How will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details. Please disclose information on SP cooperation? Are the pledged coins sufficiently prepared? When do you plan to start storage?
Dear official allocator, thanks for the review!
Can you send a business license to my email for review?
chenzhuodd@sina.com
Business license has been provided.
Check the past records, have a good storage experience, the first round is willing to support, can be issued according to the "good reputation and perfect history of the old customer" criteria, considering the total amount of applications is relatively large, the first round of the 512 TiB according to the amount issued.
Total DataCap requested
15PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
1000TiB
DataCap Amount - First Tranche
512TiB
Client address
f13ckbkkygufutsdlxwz5zzlupvqlnz5fwdreqqoa
f13ckbkkygufutsdlxwz5zzlupvqlnz5fwdreqqoa
512TiB
115b4005-c9de-41bc-829f-bb34f8869da6
Application is ready to sign
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedxox6gxvwbr7xzpjmnu2urgucfgvgbs7jti43ij7tsll55oosll6
Address
f13ckbkkygufutsdlxwz5zzlupvqlnz5fwdreqqoa
Datacap Allocated
512TiB
Signer Address
f13a6ov3nrxllvyqkduwczpyashgu3luivodwyvgq
Id
115b4005-c9de-41bc-829f-bb34f8869da6
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedxox6gxvwbr7xzpjmnu2urgucfgvgbs7jti43ij7tsll55oosll6
Application is Granted
Client used 75% of the allocated DataCap. Consider allocating next tranche.
checker:manualTrigger
No client address found for this issue.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
checker:manualTrigger
No client address found for this issue.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
Client used 75% of the allocated DataCap. Consider allocating next tranche.
The datacap-bot DC usage quota assignment push looks fine, but the checker:manualTrigger button doesn't seem to be recognized.That's fine, I'll submit a work order for the official team to handle. @willscott
Hi @ChrisDracula Based on the past good storage experience and record, please support the second round of DC, is in communication with f03156617, f03091739, f03055005,f03148356,f03144037 and other SPs, you can pay attention to the follow-up report, we will be compliant.Thank you very much!
Based on a good history, I‘m willing to keep the trust going in new rounds, please follow the rules for data storage. Also, I would like to know @willscott how I can review the user's sealed data reports behind the scenes?
Given that a sufficient number of miners have been reached, we are willing to approve a second batch of 512TiB.
Application is in Refill
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceaxbu4zo2fq47kx3x4xm6fllsiof2h5t4klznbfnwigd2q7ohi4n4
Address
f13ckbkkygufutsdlxwz5zzlupvqlnz5fwdreqqoa
Datacap Allocated
512TiB
Signer Address
f13a6ov3nrxllvyqkduwczpyashgu3luivodwyvgq
Id
e122faa5-98e8-40db-92b3-9cfc3beaa5c5
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceaxbu4zo2fq47kx3x4xm6fllsiof2h5t4klznbfnwigd2q7ohi4n4
Application is Granted
Client used 75% of the allocated DataCap. Consider allocating next tranche.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 60.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 14.28%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Why is the Spark retrieval rate not successful enough?
As we all know, we have always known that the community consensus search methods are GraphSync, Bitswap and Http, so we have been using the results of these three search methods as a sign of search success, until we learned at the notarized meeting that the newest search criterion is based on the retrieval results on Spark.
Some of our SPs have timely information access, some nodes have reached 27% and 89%, and some SPs are studying Spark search principles and adjusting their configurations to adapt to Spark search requirements.
Please continue to support, Spark retrieval success rate will continue to improve.
We are willing to support this signature, but please improve the retrieval rate.
Application is in Refill
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceb2auqvaim3omr2or3tzqvryntu6iw6pym3agakm33knnvz6tisks
Address
f13ckbkkygufutsdlxwz5zzlupvqlnz5fwdreqqoa
Datacap Allocated
1PiB
Signer Address
f13a6ov3nrxllvyqkduwczpyashgu3luivodwyvgq
Id
5e380056-e79c-4238-873b-58bc36eebcf2
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceb2auqvaim3omr2or3tzqvryntu6iw6pym3agakm33knnvz6tisks
Application is Granted
Client used 75% of the allocated DataCap. Consider allocating next tranche.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 40.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 70.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
We are currently in communication and collaboration with the following SPs:
f01106668 f0870558 f01315096 f03055018 f03055029 f01518369 f01889668 f03151449 f03151456 f03179555 f03179570 f03188440 f03190614 f03190616
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 30.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 70.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Overall it looks like an improvement, can you elaborate on the reason why ⚠️ 30.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero?
Dear Notary,we have had repeated communications with the SPs with a Spark retrieval rate of 0. They have informed us that adapting to the Spark model requires some adjustments and that they are currently on the Mid-Autumn Festival holiday in China. The technical staff from the SPs have assured us that they will gradually improve the Spark retrieval rate in the future. As indicated in the report, most of the SPs we are working with are making continuous progress. We appreciate your continued support. Thank you!
Given the positive historical performance, we will continue to support this round. However, if there is no improvement in the Spark retrieval rate in the future, I will consider implementing restrictions or suspending the Datacap distribution strategy.
Application is in Refill
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzaceah2cvwf2gzxfsxmvy52otgoyb67dagosfj3eoeizdimwapoiaw56
Address
f13ckbkkygufutsdlxwz5zzlupvqlnz5fwdreqqoa
Datacap Allocated
2PiB
Signer Address
f13a6ov3nrxllvyqkduwczpyashgu3luivodwyvgq
Id
4fe9e025-907f-4a4f-95cb-5b0188d8632e
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceah2cvwf2gzxfsxmvy52otgoyb67dagosfj3eoeizdimwapoiaw56
Application is Granted
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 20.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 80.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 8 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f03179570: 40.69%, f03178144: 49.64%, f03178077: 48.93%, f03055018: 49.72%, f03055029: 49.68%, f03151456: 40.44%, f03151449: 39.05%, f02013352: 49.13%
⚠️ 17.65% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 70.59% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
⚠️ 25.50% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Why does the report seem to have worsened, please explain or I will be making further Datacap approval interventions.
Version
1
DataCap Applicant
winter
Project ID
5
Data Owner Name
Xuet
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
Education & Training
Website
https://www.xuetian.cn/
Social Media Handle
https://www.xuetian.cn/
Social Media Type
Other
What is your role related to the dataset
Data Preparer
Total amount of DataCap being requested
15PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
950TiB
Number of replicas to store
10
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
1000TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f13ckbkkygufutsdlxwz5zzlupvqlnz5fwdreqqoa
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Commercial/Enterprise
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
If you are a data preparer. What is your location (Country/Region)
None
If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?
No response
If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)
No response
Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.
No response
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Sporadic
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
1.5 to 2 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, Africa, North America, South America, Europe, Australia (continent), Antarctica
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, Shipping hard drives
How did you find your storage providers
Slack, Partners
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you used
No response
Please list the provider IDs and location of the storage providers you will be working with.
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes