I realized today that we lack a license file for this repo. I believe it got lost during the migration. When I went to go update it and add it back, I thought I should double check if there's other licenses that make sense for documentation. I checked MDN, and they use CC BY-SA 2.5 for all written content and public domain CC0 for samples. I feel we should do the same instead of continuing with MIT. It seems like this is the same practice that Wikipedia uses.
I realized today that we lack a license file for this repo. I believe it got lost during the migration. When I went to go update it and add it back, I thought I should double check if there's other licenses that make sense for documentation. I checked MDN, and they use CC BY-SA 2.5 for all written content and public domain CC0 for samples. I feel we should do the same instead of continuing with MIT. It seems like this is the same practice that Wikipedia uses.
This was our original license file https://github.com/StrataSource/Wiki/blob/old-wiki/LICENSE.txt
This is MDN's license file https://github.com/mdn/content/blob/main/LICENSE.md