Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
At this moment I see little advantage in 64-bit XLD. I can move XLD to 64-bit
any minute, but I won't do it until PPC support is dropped from XLD.
Why do you want 64-bit native XLD?
Original comment by tmkkmac
on 18 Jun 2011 at 2:26
Original comment by tmkkmac
on 18 Jun 2011 at 2:27
Thanks for the quick reply.
I was under the impression that 64-bit mode would process bulk/mass
conversions faster. If that is not the case, then please disregard. I
appreciate the application!
Original comment by vikingsc...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2011 at 2:55
Some codecs will become a bit faster due to increased registers, some will
become slower due to lack of assembly code optimization. All things considered,
I think it makes little difference.
Original comment by tmkkmac
on 18 Jun 2011 at 3:03
Makes sense. Thanks again for the info.
Original comment by vikingsc...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2011 at 4:24
Actually this might help with large batches, for example when the user converts
many albums at once, especially when converting FLAC to ALAC or other
high-bitrate format. XLD could use the extra RAM. Most applications are 64-bit
these days.
Although I do agree, this is not critical.
Original comment by WiHHi.Z3...@gmail.com
on 31 Jul 2013 at 8:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
vikingsc...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2011 at 2:02